Friday, January 6, 2012
Live streaming of MDM16
Note 1: My Safari browser under Mac OS X 10.5.8 has trouble with the video player, but Firefox works fine.
Note 2: If you tune in before the kick-off at Noon this Saturday, you may only see a static image or some canned footage.
Thursday, January 5, 2012
What to expect?
Packing for MDM16 now, I was reminded of reading this 4-part post when I was anticipating my first MDM.
... The young woman Carol spoke with last night is one of them, now attired in pajamas and bathrobe. ...If this is your first MDM, you can expect a well-organized, tolerant, focused, quietly convivial affair.
Wednesday, December 21, 2011
The Extracts, yes!
At 11:30 a.m. in the Bourne Building, Melville Society members will read many of the 80 brief "Extracts" related to whales and whaling, which Melville included before Chapter 1.Is someone at the Museum reading this blog? Both Lemuel and I have argued that the MDM curiously omits two chapters of Moby-Dick: Etymology and Extracts. (And the Iron-Bound Bucket concurs!)
Now it appears that the MDM is, at least partially, addressing our pleas. (Why not read all of the Extracts? Why skip Etymology?)
Still, it's clear, the Marathon gets better every year!!
Note: The Bourne Building is that older part of the museum, which houses the Lagoda.
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
How To Prepare for the All-Night Reading
What, if anything, can you do to stay alert for the entire 25-hour reading of Moby-Dick? Lemuel seems to have no problem staying focused for the whole show, while I start to flag around 4:00 AM and nod-off in my chair a couple of hours later. Chalk it up to age (mine), intelligence (his), or the fact that Lemuel arrives sober as the chief justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, while I less so.A troll of the Web returns lots of suggestions from college kids who face all-night cram sessions: caffeine, B-vitamins, pumpin' music, occasional 10-minute naps (and bumming Ritalin from dorm-mates [not recommended by Lemuel or me]).
One article cites "chronobiologist" Cynthia LaJambe who, even after her studies at Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR), can only advise "a short nap [less than 20 minutes] and a moderate amount of caffeine, like a cup of coffee, is still the best approach."
An article in The Guardian gives advice for cricket fans trying to go for days without sleep so they can watch The Ashes match series televised from Australia. They recommend: a high-protein meal beforehand, high-protein snacks during, no alcohol, no large doses of caffeine, vitamin B supplement afterwards.
One study holds particular promise for us Marathoners: "Sleep Extension Improves Performance and Facilitates Task Acquisition During and Following 7 Nights of Subsequent Sleep Restriction," by Dr. Tracy Rupp, also at WRAIR. Its findings were summarized by BBC News. The bottom line is: extra sleep each night of the week before the MDM will help you "perform" better, and recover faster. They call it "banking sleep." (Dr. Tracy also recommends naps.)
Here's my list of suggestions:
- Arrange local accommodations for Sunday night well before the MDM. (See Lemuel's post on sleep-deprived driving.)
- Come well-rested and well-fed. Try to "bank" some shut-eye the nights prior.
- Bring a copy of M-D with large type.
- Stay hydrated.
- Pace your intake of caffeine & sugar. Some folks use green tea for its reduced caffeine content -- bring your own (hot water is available).
- Take breaks in the snack room. You'll meet some interesting folks there.
- Step outside for some bracing January air and imagine Melville's arrival in New Bedford.
- Save the adult beverages for after the reading, if you're absolutely convinced that it will help.
Wednesday, February 2, 2011
How to Be a Good Moby-Dick Marathon Reader, Part 3
Reading aloud involves a continuously repeated series of steps. The reader receives visual stimuli (printing on a page or screen), deciphers the words and phrases represented by the stimuli, determines how to say them, says them, hears himself say them, perhaps also sees or hears the audience's reaction to what he's said, and adds what he's heard himself say (and possibly the audience's reaction) to his determination of how to say the words and phrases that come next. On top of all that, by the time he's saying one set of words, he's already beginning to digest the next set. The psychologist Egon Brunswik devised a model for our processes of perceiving and acting that (in the way social scientists have of describing things) cloaks a familiar experience with rather unseethroughable terminology. In simplified terms, at one end of the model sits the "distal stimulus," such as words printed on a page. The distal stimulus emits "proximal cues" (such as reflected light waves) from which the "organism" (i.e., you or I) selects those cues that are relevant for the organism's present purpose (some marks on a page are relevant to reading aloud, while others, such as finger smudges, are not). From the selected cues, the organism derives an ultimate perception, or "percept" (e.g., the idea that the next phrase to be read is "great, Monadnock hump"). Then there is an "action" process that works somewhat in reverse. It begins inside the organism, with a "central motivational state," on the basis of which the organism chooses "proximal means" to achieve a "distal end."
Depending on your habits of mind, that last paragraph is either helpful or ridiculous. If you're a mental plodder like me, you might be thankful to have handles for the different things that go on when we read aloud. Reading aloud demands the execution of impressively complex behavior, since the reader steadily takes in printing -- proximal cues from a stream of distal stimuli -- while simultaneously producing comprehensible speech -- harnessing proximal means to reach his distal ends.
Given everything that has to happen, most of it inside the reader's head, for someone to read out loud, determining why someone has difficulty reading well is nigh impossible. But I'll venture to say that many marathon readers who perform poorly do so largely because they pressure themselves to read faster than they comfortably can.
All of which leads me to the third principle in our continuing series:
Rule 3: Read at a pace that is comfortable for you, even if it seems too slow.
When a reader pushes herself to read as fast as she can, or faster, two things happen. First, the phrases come out in disjointed spurts. A familiar clause comes out at breakneck speed, then a difficult word or two is stumbled over, then some more familiar words are rushed through, and so on, with phrasing dictated not by Melville's meaning, but by how easy or hard the language is. Second, the reader makes far more mistakes than he otherwise would, prompting constant self-correction as a word is misconstrued, the error is caught, and the word is repeated.
No one expects the text to be read quickly. We're not in a rush to find out what happens in the end; we all know that Darth Vader is Ishmael's father. We listen because we love how Melville wrote. We want to enjoy his artistry. What most of the audience would prefer, therefore, is a smooth, steady reading, at a lazy, conversational pace. In all the hours I've spent listening to marathon readers, I can think of only one who struck me as reading too slowly. And even he was not annoyingly slow. On the other hand, many many readers read (or try to read) too fast.
Tuesday, February 1, 2011
The Moby-Dick Marathon Can Be Dangerous to Your Health
The fine folks at "Mythbusters" demonstrated the effects of sleep deprivation on driving in a recent episode of the show. (Specifically, it was episode #153, which originally aired on Nov. 3, 2010.) Two of the younger members of the crew, Kari and Tory, tested the claim that driving while sleep deprived is more dangerous than driving while tipsy. A driving course was laid out, including both a complicated "city" portion and a monotonous "highway" portion. Then Kari and Tory drank enough to raise their blood alcohol level to just below the legal limit in California. Each of them drove the course, and their errors were recorded.
For the sleep-deprivation part of the experiment, Kari and Tory stayed awake for 30 hours, which, as it happens, matches pretty well the experience of staying awake for an entire Moby-Dick marathon. They then drove the same course. On the "highway" portion, both of them did much worse than they had while tipsy, making more than twice as many recorded mistakes. On the "city" portion, Tory also did a good deal worse while sleep deprived (Kari was actually a tiny bit better tired than tipsy).
Now, one important difference between Kari and Tory's sleep-deprivation experience and that of most marathoners is that Kari and Tory were not permitted any caffeine or sugar during their period without sleep. Most Moby-Dick marathoners get plenty of caffeine, and sugar is also much in evidence. But I wouldn't rely on that to get me home safely.
My recommendation is that if you're going to stay for the whole marathon, you plan to spend Sunday night in New Bedford. That way, you can enjoy a leisurely afternoon and dinner following the marathon, and a good night's rest before facing the drive home.
Tuesday, January 25, 2011
How to Be a Good Moby-Dick Marathon Reader, Part 2
Hence the next principle in our ongoing series:
Rule 2: Speak the text, the whole text, and nothing but the text.
Your responsibility as a reader is to pick up where the previous reader left off and to read on until you're signaled to stop, when the next reader takes up the burden. The entire marathon should comprise an unbroken series of different voices that together take us, without frolics or detours, from "Call me Ishmael ..." to "... only found another orphan."
When you read, therefore, you should adhere religiously to what Melville wrote. The words that he set down, in the arrangements he selected, move us and inspire us to sustain this communal experience. Without his text, we are become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal.
Ideally, nothing in Moby-Dick should be omitted. In practice, however, some things are. The introductory "Etymology" and "Extracts" are deliberately excluded, as I've discussed. The handling of chapter titles and Melville's footnotes varies from reader to reader; some skip them, others do not. I would prefer that readers not skip chapter titles and especially not footnotes. A much more serious matter is the occasional accidental skipping of text. Readers have been known to skip a couple of paragraphs by accident. No one likes that, but it is usually allowed to pass in silence. In 2010, however, one reader skipped so much text (presumably by turning several leaves at once) that the "watch" stopped her and asked her to go back.
By the same token, nothing should be added to what Melville wrote. The audience wants no jocular asides, no dedicatory prefaces, no autobiographical embellishments, no pleas for indulgence, no shout-outs to peeps. The participants in the New Bedford marathon take their Melville straight. He provides more than enough commentary and wit for anyone, and doesn't need our feeble efforts to "improve" upon his work.
Sunday, January 23, 2011
Facing the Podium at the Moby-Dick Marathon
Sing, O goddess, the anger of Achilles son of Peleus, that
brought countless ills upon the Achaeans. Many a brave soul did
it send hurrying down to Hades, and many a hero did it yield a
prey to dogs and vultures, for so were the counsels of Jove
fulfilled from the day on which the son of Atreus, king of men,
and great Achilles, first fell out with one another.
- The Iliad, Book 1
Saturday, January 22, 2011
How to Be a Good Moby-Dick Marathon Reader, Part 1
When you register, no one inquires into your qualifications or lack thereof. They don't even ask if you've read Moby-Dick or are a member of the museum. Not unlike a Quaker meeting, where the Inner Light might move anyone to speak, the marathon denies nobody who registers the opportunity to be heard. Eloquence or learning is not a prerequisite.
Just as not everyone is a born preacher, not everyone is a born reader. The quality of marathon readings varies as much as the backgrounds of the volunteers. Still, I believe it's possible to agree on a handful of principles that, if observed, will help you read in a most pleasing manner. We will propose these principles from time to time in a series of posts.
Rule 1: Do not shout.
The podiums at which the readers stand are equipped with sensitive microphones. They will pick up and amplify perfectly well whatever you say in a normal speaking voice. If you come on board "shouting like a boatswain in a gale of wind," the amplified sound will knock the listeners out of their chairs. It's painful. The back row will hear you fine without shouting.
Friday, January 21, 2011
The Graveyard Shift
Moby-Dick being what it is, a 600-ish page novel, it cannot be read in one sitting without including the wee hours of the morning. The fact that the New Beford Moby-Dick marathon is held in early January, when the nights are especially long and cheerless, only strengthens its right to hold itself out (should its organizers so choose) as the marathon of marathons.
I enjoy the Graveyard Shift more than any other part of the marathon. The beginning and end of the marathon are the crowd-pleasers. That's when the most novelistic and most accessible parts of the book are read. Ishmael meets Queequeg; Orson Welles (oops, I mean Father Mapple) gives his sermon in the Seamen's Bethel; Ishmael and Queequeg join the Pequod's crew; we meet Ahab, Starbuck, Stubb, Flask, Tashtego, and Daggoo; "Death to Moby Dick!" ... Then jump ahead 400 pages, we chase Moby Dick around the Pacific, "Ahab beckons" (well, maybe not), Finis. No shortage of readers and listeners for those parts of the book.
The Graveyard Shift attracts the die-hards. This is when we reach the chapters that casual readers are inclined to skip: "Of the Monstrous Pictures of Whales" (Ch. LV); "The Great Heidelburgh Tun" (Ch. LXXVII); "Jonah Historically Regarded" (Ch. LXXXIII); "A Bower in the Arsacides" (Ch. CII). But those who stay up for the Graveyard Shift are treated to the rarefied pleasures of haute école expository Melville.
It is also at this time that every individual's contribution is most strongly felt. Those participating and following along can be taken in with one glance -- perhaps a dozen in all. Even if you don't speak to them, they become your comrades in a way that cannot happen when it's light outside and a crowd is on hand. The comedy of it, too, becomes most apparent. Sitting up at 3:00 am listening to people take turns reading Moby-Dick out loud -- how is this not ridiculous?
Wednesday, January 19, 2011
Taking the Podium at the Moby-Dick Marathon
If you can tolerate gotcha TV, this display does contain some psychological interest. The complete lack of connection between how some people sound and how they think they sound raises intriguing questions about self-perception. It's hard to believe, but apparently true, that many people whose singing sounds like howling cats are nevertheless convinced they actually rival Judy Garland or [insert current pop singer of your choice].
Every January, I wonder if Moby-Dick marathon readers are similarly deluded. It has to be said that some readers are really quite bad, God bless them. They mean well; they're genuine Melville fans; they do the best they can. But no matter who you are, your best in certain endeavors just isn't very good. Indeed, your absolute best might be among the worst.
Do bad readers know they're bad? No one in the marathon audience ever gives any indication if someone's performance is less than stellar. Some bad readers do seem aware of the effect they're having, since I've seen a few gasp with relief when they're done, as if they'd just finished hacking a path through bamboo with a dull machete. If someone has such self-awareness, I can only respect her the more, even though my enjoyment is lessened. It's one thing for a person who reads out loud frequently and fluently to stand in front of a crowd of strangers and presume to read Moby-Dick to them. It's quite another thing for someone who knows he's a halting, stumbling reader to nonetheless risk humiliating himself in order to do his duty by Melville and the marathon.
Tuesday, January 18, 2011
Etymology and Extracts at the New Bedford Moby Dick Marathon
I guess I can see the logic behind this choice. The marathon, which now starts dramatically with an Ishmael impersonator (for lack of a better term) reading "Loomings" in the museum's Lagoda Room, would probably turn off many would-be participants if they had to sit through 15-20 minutes of non-narrative quotations from other authors before even getting to "Call me Ishmael."
Nevertheless, it doesn't seem right. A Moby-Dick marathon without "Etymology" and "Extracts" is like a Scarlet Letter marathon without "The Custom-House," or a Giles Goat-Boy marathon without the comic editors' statements on why they should or should not have published the manuscript. Is it really a marathon if you intentionally omit part of the text?
When I first raised this issue with Gansevoort, he suggested doing a "guerrilla reading" of "Etymology" and "Extracts" in front of the museum before the regular marathon begins. I like that in theory. But in the hour before the marathon, most people are too busy getting settled with their gear and what-not inside the building to have any time or attention to spare. Plus, New Bedford in January is not the best place for standing around reading or listening to yet more Melville.
Another possibility, now that the museum has started streaming the marathon, would be to have a virtual reading of the introductory material. Thus, even if it didn't happen live, a reading of the etymology and extracts would at least be part of the marathon in some sense. And I suppose a third possibility is simply to arrive early and read the etymology and extracts silently by oneself, while waiting for Ishmael to begin. Who knows, maybe some attendees do that already.
Sunday, January 16, 2011
Good Behavior at the New Bedford Moby-Dick Marathon
The marathon proceeds in surprisingly good order, notwithstanding that it is free and open to all, in the heart of a modern city. I don't know what would happen if someone chose to disrupt it; I imagine there are city police ready to respond to serious trouble. But the fact is that the attendees behave themselves spontaneously.
But something else is at work as well, something peculiarly of New England. In his masterpiece Patriotic Gore: Studies in the Literature of the American Civil War, critic Edmund Wilson writes (in his chapter on Harriet Beecher Stowe) about "the crisis of Calvinist theology" in 19th-century New England, when the old-line Congregationalist ministers started losing large numbers of worshipers to more forgiving churches and denominations. Yet, as he also points out, the Calvinist mind-habits survived. Hard work, lawfulness, and the odd blend of self-reliance and community service did not vanish when the doctrine of predestination softened. Underneath the Emersonian kumbaya, it supplied the core of steel evident in the abolition movement and the Civil War.
We detect its vestiges today in Massachusetts, in orderly public events such as the Moby-Dick marathon. The mature gents and ladies who smoothly and quietly run the show, the volunteers who provide dinner and nighttime snacks with uncomplaining regularity, the readers who respectfully take us through Melville's creation, the listeners who peacefully follow along -- I don't believe quite the same picture could be seen anywhere outside New England.
Tuesday, January 11, 2011
The Moby-Dick Marathon in Its Procedural Aspect
But one of the beauties of the New Bedford Moby-Dick marathon is that it attracts precisely those people who are most likely to be excited about the idea of a Moby-Dick marathon. If you're reading this, I assume you're one of them.
The marathon has evolved over the years and will no doubt continue to develop. It is currently a three-day affair. Everything takes place in the New Bedford Whaling Museum except for one side excursion that I will mention in due course. On Friday evening, the marathon proper is heralded by a dinner (reservations required), after which a lecture is given by a Melville scholar. These preliminaries attract, I would estimate, 50-100 people. Next, on Saturday morning, there was this year a new event that I hope will be repeated -- a stump-the-scholars program in which six Melville experts were divided into two teams and competed in trying to answer Moby-Dick-related questions posed by the audience (and in a few cases by the emcee, one of the curators at the museum if I'm not mistaken).
The reading moves to different spots in the museum for two segments: Chapter XXXII (Cetology) is read in the gallery containing a complete sperm whale skeleton, and Chapter XL (Midnight, Forecastle) is performed by a troupe in the auditorium. (This year, they added several other chapters to the auditorium segment.) But by 9:00 or so, we're in the Jacobs Family Gallery for the duration.
Around 6 or 7 pm on Saturday, the gracious volunteers serve clam chowder, baked beans, and bread pudding in an adjoining room. Coffee, tea, and mulled cider are provided through the night, along with assorted snacks (healthy and otherwise). The "break room" is also the place to chat with other marathoners.
Attendance is strongest at the beginning and end of the reading. As Saturday wears on and passes into Sunday, the audience gets thinner and thinner. It hits bottom around, say, 1 to 4 am on Sunday, when there are perhaps as few as 20 people in attendance, half of whom are asleep. Then the crowd returns with the sun on Sunday, waxing until the final crowd-pleasing duel between Ahab and the whale.
Thank yous, acknowledgements, and it's over for another year.
